MSU Webinar: “The Trouble with Tropicals” – March 16th

The recent boom in tropical plant production over the past few years means growers are encountering different and more challenging pests in greenhouses. Please join me and Judy Colley (Biological Technical Rep for Plant Products) for an upcoming webinar with Michigan State University Extension, where we talk about how to manage the “usual suspects” on various tropicals, as well as some of the more unique problems!

Keep reading for more information on registration.

Continue reading “MSU Webinar: “The Trouble with Tropicals” – March 16th”

Spring crops that are “magnets”for certain pests.

aphid_cali_UMAssYou know the old rhyme: “April showers bring May flowers, but what do May flowers bring? Aphids“. Or sometimes it seems that way, anyways, with Spring bedding crops.

To help guide your pest management program this year, our  friends (superiors?) over at Michigan State Extension have released a handy  list of which crops are likely to attract which pests.  Keep reading for more info.

Continue reading “Spring crops that are “magnets”for certain pests.”

Mealybugs…on poinsettia??

MB on stems
Citrus mealybug feeding on a flower stem.

Last year several consultants and I noticed something strange.  A number of greenhouses in Ontario had noticeable infestations of mealybug in their poinsettia crop.  This was the first time many in their 25+ year careers had seen this (e.g. see Mel Sawaya’s article in Greenhouse Canada Magazine).

It’s unclear yet if phenomenon will repeat itself this year (or perhaps affect even more operations), but growers should be on the lookout for this pest. Keep reading for more information about the potential cause of these mealybug infestations, and possible solutions.

Continue reading “Mealybugs…on poinsettia??”

Mealybug control in Ontario’s floriculture crops

Ontario has several pests for which floriculture IPM programs have yet to be perfected.  Mealybug (MB) is one, and its incidence seems to be on the rise.  This post outlines current control strategies, but more work needs to be done.

Two species are generally a problem: the cirtrus mealybug (Planococcus citri) and the long-tailed mealybug (Pseduococcus longispinus).

A single long-tailed mealybug on a leaf.
Long-tailed mealybug (older nymph or adult). Photo by S. Jandricic.  Mealybugs produce unsightly, cottony masses, and produce large amounts of honeydew.

Citrus mealybug
Citrus mealybug adult (white, segmented insect), nymphs (small, pinkish) and egg mass (cottony blob below adult). Photo by G. Murphy.


MB control on potted plants is difficult, but is achieved through a combination of pesticides and removal of highly infested plants.

Contact pesticides don’t work for MB because of their waxy coating, and systemic pesticides like Beleaf and Intercept aren’t registered for MB.  Systemic pesticides also won’t provide complete control, since MB commonly feeds on stems, where active ingredients are less available (see this article).

Citrus mealybug feeding on a flower stem.
Citrus mealybugs feeding on a flower stem. Photo by S. Jandricic

Repeated applications of Landscape oil (which smothers MB) are your best bet in potted plants, and can be applied foliarly or as a dip. Note that  EVERY plant variety should be tested for oil phytotoxicity before use.

But, how do you control MB in a crop that you can’t throw out, dip, or apply oils to?

For cut flower crops, the answer seems to be with Cyrptolaemus (a predatory beetle specialized for MB) and some patience.

I recently visited a grower that released high rates of Cryptolaemus larvae in a test area in week 15 to see if they could get ahead of their problem MB this Spring (300 larvae/m2/week for 3 weeks).  They also released adult beetles in two houses at a low rate (0.17/m2), with hopes it would establish 1.

An adult Cryptolaemus beetle. Also referred to as “mealybug destroyer”. Photo by S. Jandricic

Even at such high release rates, control was slow – only 5-15% during the first 3 weeks.  This is likely due Cryptolaemus’s lower development and predation rates at lower temperatures (avg. 18- 20ºC). But, on week 18, MB control increased to 30%.  And, the larvae that appeared in adult-release areas seemed more voracious than their packaged counterparts, cleaning up some plants completely

A larvae of Cryptolaemus that crawled up a stem to eat mealybug.  Cryptolaemus larvae are similar in appearance to their prey, also producing a waxy covering.
This Cryptolaemus larva is covered in a waxy, filamentous coating, making it similar in appearance to its prey.  Photo by S. Jandricic

However, once Cryptolaemus introductions stopped for a few weeks, progress stalled.  Weekly introductions were started on week 23 (0.17 larvae/m2 AND 0.17 adults/m2). 2

Now (as of week 28), up to 95% control has been achieved in some areasWe’re hoping the predator will be able to clean up most of the crop by fall. I’ll keep you posted!

What can we learn from this trial? To control MB with Cryptolaemus, we need the following:

  •  Warm temperatures. Cyrptolaemus doesn’t function well below 21 ºC; releases probably shouldn’t begin until at least week 18. Other control measures need to be taken before this (we are still working on what, exactly, these should be).
  • Releases of larvae AND adults.  Both were useful here. Attacking all MB life stages, larvae were effective in hot spots, but couldn’t disperse far.  Adult Cryptolaemus only eat MB egg masses, but dispersed and produced new larvae throughout the crop. (Note that Cryptolaemus adults will not reproduce if only longtailed MB is present!)
  • Repeated releases. MB produce a crap load of babies (>350 per female!), so consistent predation is key. Cryptolaemus doesn’t appear to establish in the greenhouse, so repeated introductions are necessary.
  • Patience. Cryptolaemus takes time to build up populations and start doing its job – sometimes several weeks. Growers should monitor pest and predator levels closely during this time, but resist the urge to switch to pesticides.
1 Product supplied by Koppert; insect levels monitored weekly by P. Kelley. Progress of the experiment was also observed by the grower and S. Jandricic. Final release rates worked out to 2-3 larvae/m2 and 2-3 adults/m2; successful rates are likely to vary between crops and situations.